tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19386345.post2923254694899179772..comments2023-02-20T23:53:56.458+08:00Comments on IP Dragon 知識產權龍: 2010: Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: "Baidu, Sohu/Sogou Are No Copyright Pirates"IP Dragonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06285334008761103494noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19386345.post-22148431871936024862010-01-28T17:19:46.936+08:002010-01-28T17:19:46.936+08:00So what's the point here? That Baidu is claimi...So what's the point here? That Baidu is claiming lack of knowledge of infringement? What kind of proof can be used to prove "knowledge"? At what point do "red flags" that a company has an infringement-based business model become self evident (this is the approach that some Chinese scholars and courts are advocating). <br /><br />The frightening part is that deep linking is yesterday's problem, - User Generated Content sites and P2P programs provide even more opportunities for infringement, for more content (such as movies, and not merely music) with business models that may be based on even more limited ISP/ICP oversight. China furthermore lacks a notion of contributory infringement, or "inducement" - inducement was borrowed into US copyright law from patent law, and the recent patent JI (end of 2009), removed the inducement language I believe. Or is there something about these cases that we don't know about?chinaipr@yahoo.com/Marknoreply@blogger.com