Business Software Alliance (BSA) has commissioned IDC to do an annual survey about software piracy in China as well. The difference between the BSA/IDC and SAIC/Chinalabs.com results is significance. In 2005 there has been a controversy about BSA's statistics (see the Economist article, “BSA or just BS”, about dodgy piracy data, so this year a video of John Gantz, Chief Research Officer of IDC is posted where he explains the methodology for the BSA/IDC Global Software Piracy Study.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics" (19th century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli)
- 2005 66 percent (SAIC/Chinalabs.com); 86 percent (BSA/IDC);
- 2006 63 percent (SAIC/Chinalabs.com); 82 percent (BSA/IDC);
- 2007 56 percent (SAIC/Chinalabs.com); 82 percent (BSA/IDC);
- 2008 47 percent (SAIC/Chinalabs.com); 80 percent (BSA/IDC);
- 2009 45 percent (SAIC/Chinalabs.com); 79 percent (BSA/IDC).
Unsurprisingly Chinalabs.com questions BSA's methods. And IP Dragon questions's Chinalabs.com methods. So if you question my methods, please send your comment below.
See the China Daily article here.
Surprised that 45% actually agreed to having pirated software on phone.
ReplyDeleteDid 'Computer assisted' telephone interviews have anything to do with installing confidence in them?