Showing posts with label Christopher Heath. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Heath. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Taiwan Dead Serious About Copyright On Funeral Music

Ralph Jennings reported for the Voice of America about two lawsuits of Taiwanese studios against funeral houses in Taichung. Mr Jennings writes: "Taiwanese funeral homes play pre-recorded music at traditional ceremonies, some of which also involve live bands and street parades to honor the dead." Read more here.

Lin Shu-hui previously wrote for the Taipei Times: "Music and Buddhist chants during funerals are usually provided by the funeral homes, mostly using a gadget called the Electric Buddhism Sutra Player or music CDs." Read more here.

A life band playing during a traditional ceremony can be seen as a public performance.
Article 7bis Taiwan's Copyright Law 2008: A performance by a performer of a pre-existing work or folklore shall be protected as an independent work. Protection of a performance shall not affect the copyright in the pre-existing work.
And relating to the CDs: according to article 5 (8) Taiwan's Copyright Law 2008, sound recordings are copyrighted works.
















What about Buddhist chants that are played via a CD or an Electric Buddhism Sutra Player, which is a device that plays a sutra (teaching of the Buddha) continuously by going in a loop, and is often given away for free at Buddhist temples. Even thought the music and lyrics are not copyrighted (read more about Buddhism in relation to IP in Zen and the Art of Intellectual Property), the performance of the work is (article 7bis Taiwan's Copyright Law 2008).  

According to Wang Mei-hua, director general of the Taiwan government’s Intellectual Property Office these conflicts between studios and funeral companies signal that it is difficult to find a right compensation. She also pointed out that to collect copyright fees at the popular Karaoke bars is complex in Taiwan, because the island has five (I count 6) copyright collecting societies: 

  • Music Copyright Association of Taiwan (MCAT); 
  • Music Copyright Intermediary Society of Chinese Taipei (MUST); 
  • Music Copyright Intermediary Society of Taiwan (TMCS); 
  • Audiovisual Music Copyright Owner Association (AMCO); 
  • Association of Recording Copyright Owners of ROC (ARCO); 
  • Recording Copyright & Publications Administrative Society of Chinese Taipei (RPAT).  
This list I found in the interesting article that Professor Kung-Chung Liu wrote how the music CD business in Taiwan withered away and the online music industry in Taiwan flourished, and the rise and fall of P2P file-sharing services and how the copyright legislation responded to these developments. Read here.

Professor Kung-Chung Liu, who last year gave a speech at HKU on Cross-Strait Cooperation Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Protection, see here, is also a co-author of the excellent book called Intellectual Property Law in Taiwan which is edited by Christopher Heath, and part of the Max Planck Series on Asian Intellectual Property Law published by Kluwer Law International.
continue reading ...

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Landmark in IP (Part I Cases)

Exceptional cases
might not be
exemplary cases
then again:  the
extraordinary
can shine a light
on the ordinary
Messrs Anselm Kamperman Sanders and Christopher Heath, decade long organisers of and contributors to the leading intellectual property (IP) seminar in Macau, have now written a chapter and edited nine other authors of Landmark Intellectual Property Cases And Their Legacy, in which some of the cases, that were dealt with at the seminars in Macau, were revisited.

In Part II, I will elaborate on the seminar in Macau that I attended last May. Now, I will give an overview of the contents of the book per chapter.

Landmark Intellectual Property Cases and Their Legacy

  • Chapter 1. André Bertrand (André Bertrand et Associés in Paris) wrote about the French supreme court: copyright, contract and moral rights.
  • Chapter 2. Peter K. Yu (professor at Drake University Law School) also dealt with moral rights.
  • Chapter 3. Matthias Leistner (professor at the University of Bonn, and former guest professor at Xiamen University and Tonji University in Shanghai) explored the legacy of International New Service versus Associated Press (USA).
  • Chapter 4. Anselm Kamperman Sanders (professor at Maastricht University) gives an introductory to the Odol case and its legacy.
  • Chapter 5. Matthew Fisher (senior lecturer at Institute of Brand and Innovation Law at University College London) wrote about Darcy versus Allen.
  • Chapter 6. Kung-Chung Liu (research fellow at the Institutum Jurisprudentiae, Academica Sinica) about the Taiwanese CD-R cases, abuses of monopolistic position, cartel and compulsory licensing.
  • Chapter 7. Alain Strowel (Covington & Burling in Brussels and professor at Saint-Louis, Université de Liège and Katholieke Universiteit Brussel-Leuven) and Vicky Hanley (European Competitive Telecommunications Association) took on the Anton Piller Case.
  • Chapter 8. Severin de Wit (Intellectual Property Expert Group Consultancy), shone his light on the eBay versus MercExchange case.
  • Chapter 9. Aldo Nicotra (Johnson Winter & Slattery in Australia), Lego cases, which include cases from Hong Kong and China.
  • Chapter 10. Christopher Heath (European Patent Office) discusses the comprehensive Budweiser cases (in over 40 jurisdictions).

In their preface Heath and Kamperman Sanders contemplate on what makes a landmark case "tower above" other cases. Extraordinary facts create exceptional cases. And, because of the extraordinary character of the facts, they might not serve as a good example for other cases. Heath and Kamperman Sanders conclude that landmark cases deal with fundamental issues. Therefore these cases will not become lapidary and continue to be relevant. I will definitely read this book.
continue reading ...

Friday, December 14, 2007

IP Dragon Starts Reviewing Books About IP in China

IP Dragon was happy to receive three very interesting book titles by post published by Kluwer Law International to review.






In the next few months expect the following reviews on IP Dragon:
and from the Max Planck series on Asian Intellectual Property law:

continue reading ...

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

8th Annual IEEM IP Seminar in Macau

Professor Anselm Kamperman Sanders of the Maastricht University, the Netherlands, informed me about The International Intellectual Property Law and Pharmaceuticals conference organised by Dr. Christopher Heath, Member of the Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Office (EPO) and himself. It will be the 8th Annual IP Seminar to be organised at the Instituto de Estudos Europeus de Macau (IEEM) from June 25 through 26 2007.

The agenda of the full programme is:
4th IEEM IP Law School June, 18-22 2007;
8th IEEM IP Seminar June, 25-26, 2007;
4th IEEM IP Master classes June, 27-29, 2007.

About this programme:

"Classes are offered in an intensive Socratic format in the course of one week by experts in the field Dr. Christopher Heath, of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, Prof. Anselm Kamperman Sanders, of Maastricht University, and local guest speakers who offer a Chinese perspective on Intellectual Property Law.

"This challenging programme also expects students to jointly prepare and argue several moot cases in a friendly, yet competitive atmosphere, providing a unique insight in the way in which participants from various jurisdictions approach international and domestic legal problems.
The IP Law School offers an excellent opportunity to prepare or refresh one’s knowledge before the 8th Annual IP Seminar and the subsequent IP Master Classes.

"IP Master Classes offer the opportunity to learn from an expert in a particular sub-discipline of Intellectual Property Law. Whereas the IP Master Classes follow the same Socratic format of the IP Law School, including the opportunity to argue mock trials, they are much more topical and are taught jointly by the regular IP Law School team and other expert speakers from the IP Seminar. This means that IP Master Classes form a seamless companion programme to the annual Intellectual Property Seminar."

See more here.
continue reading ...