Showing posts with label MPAA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MPAA. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

One Minute Film Contest to Promote IPR in China

The movie industry uses professional producers and movie stars such as Jacky Chan to promote that youngsters abide by the IPR laws, read here. Now, during the 15th Beijing Student Film Festival, the China Film Copyright Protection Association (CFCPA) and the Motion Picture of America Association (MPAA) launced a one minute film contest (in the categories of digital video, cartoons and mobile phone films) to let the group that might be most susceptible to copyright piracy to promote respect for IPR. Read Du Guodong's article for the China View here.

This encouraged (by the governement and interest group) grass-roots movement might be better perceived by the target group than a top-down approach.

Last date to hand in a film is March 15th, 2008.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Cost of Piracy Overestimated Says OECD, Underestimated Says ICC

Steve Whitehouse of Thomson Financial reports about an unpublished Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) study which puts trade losses in 2005 at up to 200 billion US dollar, considerably lower than the 600 billion US dollars estimated by the International Chamber of Commerce. Read Whitehouse's article via Forbes.com here.

US officials estimate the costs for companies [1] around the globe. of China’s counterfeit and piracy exports as between US $ 50 [2] and 60 billion [3] a year.

However, objective statistics about IP in China are a great challenge for scholars. That's why IP Dragon proposed to use the Enforcement/Infringement ratio, for it does not give absolute figures, but at least gives an indication of whether the situation improves or deteriorates, read more here.

China is not the only one to blame for its lack of transparency. Trade associations and lobby groups have their own agenda. Some argue that Business Software Alliance has misrepresented the facts [4] or that Motion Picture Association of America claims a right to misrepresent the facts [5].

Notes:
[1] This excludes the lost tax revenues for governments, lost employment, and extra costs for health and safety.
[2] “U.S. officials say its exports cost legitimate producers worldwide up to $50 billion a year in lost potential sales,” Associated Press, ‘China’s piracy hurting its own industries’, July 7, 2006, available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13617619.
[3] “International companies are losing more than $60 billion a year because of piracy in China, according to the U.S. government,” ‘U.S., EU to Fight Counterfeits From China, Russia’, Bloomberg, June 19, 2006, available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000100&sid=aTSjqiimKzYc&refer=germany.
[4] “BSA or just BS”, Economist, May 19, 2005, available at: http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_PJJPQNS.
[5] Ryan Singel, “Copyright Groups Continue Fight Against Anti-Lying and Spying Bill-Updated”, Wired Thread Level, April 11, 2007, available at: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/04/copyright_group.html.
continue reading ...