Showing posts with label Global Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global Times. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2011

After 44 Years Chinese Lovers of Literature Can Legally Buy "One Hundred Years Of Solitude"

Photo Festival Internacional de Cine en Guadalajara 
TGIF

Zhang Lei wrote a nice article for the Global Times about Thinkingdomhouse, a publisher who achieved to get a copyright license for China from Nobel Prize for Literature laureate Gabriel García Márquez to publish his masterpiece 'One hundred years of solitude' (Cien años de soledad).

"Unauthorized editions were widely available in markets as early as the 1980s, which infuriated the author, who vowed that even 150 years after his death, his works would not be authorized in China, when he visited in 1990." Well if Márquez was quoted correctly, he might be able to abstain Chinese publishers from authorised versions, but his copyright will expire 50 years after the moment he will exchange the temporary with the eternal. Then again within magic-realism, a writing style Márquez brought to great fruition, 150 years starting in the 1980s is a possibility which can not be completely excluded. It is great news that this summer an authorised version of Márquez' masterwork will be on sale in China. On the one hand it is moral rights of the author to determine whether he makes his work public or not (le droit de divulgation). On the other hand you cannot blame Chinese literature lovers that they want to read Márquez' masterpiece of which Pulitzer Prize winner William Kennedy said "the first piece of literature since the Book of Genesis that should be required reading for the entire human race."

Zhang is mentioning China's membership of the Universal Copyright Convention in 1992, as the moment the publishing industry has gradually increased awareness of copyright. According to this convention an author had to put a © on their work, his name and the year of creation in order to be protected via copyright.

Article III (1.) Universal Copyright Convention: "Any Contracting 'State which, under its domestic law, requires as a condition of copyright, compliance with formalities such as deposit, registration, notice, notarial certificates, payment of fees or manufacture or publication in that Contracting State, shall regard these requirements as satisfied with respect to all works protected in accordance with this Convention and first published outside its territory and the author of which is not one of its nationals, if from the time of the first publication all the copies of the work published with the authority of the author or other copyright proprietor bear the symbol © accompanied by the name of the copyright proprietor and the year of first publication placed in such manner and location as to give reasonable notice of claim of copyright."

Interestingly, this is in contradiction to the "no formalities" requirement of article 5 (2) Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works to which China acceded in the same year. UNESCO's Universal Copyright Convention has been rather dormant lately, but it could already make a useful distinction between works in the public domain without the © and those protected by copyright. It avoids also to some extent the copyright orphan problem, because the name must be included. Creative Commons has been "ported" to China and makes clear what kind of use is allowed online, see here. 

Read the Global Times article here.    
continue reading ...

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Patents in China: Quantity Obsessed Quality Challenged

Time for quality patents
Photo: Danny Friedmann
Now we are all following Ericsson sueing ZTE for patent infringement in Germany, UK and Italy, read here. Followed of course by ZTE trying to invalidate Ericsson's patent at China's Patent Re-examination Board, read here, because of an alleged lack of novelty, inventiveness or usefulness. In other words: lack of quality.

Wan Gang 万钢 minister of Science and Technology, was saying some remarkable things about innovation that might bode not too well for patent quality, when he was interviewed during a press conference held by the State Council Information Office, April 2 about China's scientific and technological research as outlined in the 12th Five-Year Plan.

Minister Wan was quoted by the Global Times saying that China's budget for research and experiment across the country should account for 2.2 percent of GDP. And that the number of patent-holders per 10,000 people should be the second benchmark.

One can question the usefulness of the latter benchmark. What kind of patents are meant, utility patents which are for incremental innovations, design-patents or invention patents? Read more about utility patent here. Quantity does not say much about the quality of patents. And patents are preoccupied with usefulness (article 22 Patent Law 2008), and scientific discoveries (article 25.1 Patent Law 2008) are excluded of getting a patent. while it could be the case that fundamental research is most fruitful in the longer run.

Read the interview at Global Times here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Aigo Sues HP, Dell, Sony, Toshiba and Samsung for Patent Infringements

At a Beijing court Aigo sued HP and at a Xian court it sued Toshiba for infringement of 6 patents which cover USB plus, a storage port technology.

HP, Dell, Sony, Toshiba and Samsung all received a letter from Aigo's lawyers with an invitation to negotiate within seven days. But according to Kenny Hsieh, general manager of Aigo's R&D and IP they kept quiet.

Aigo filed for a patent in China, but has already six valid patents in PCT-member countries. Therefore it has 12 months priority to get a patent in China, counting from the filing date for the PCT-patent application.

Read the Global Times' article here and John Oates article about it for The Register here.
continue reading ...

Chinese Companies Are IPR Victims Too

Lin Meilian wrote for the Global Times (China's answer to the BBC or France24) an article about a Chinese company whose IPR is being faked.

Ms Lin writes: "The report in Shenzhen-based Jing Bao quoted Fang Zhen, marketing manager of Crastal Technology (Shenzhen) Company, saying that some of the company's patented products were found to be copied overseas and then imported back to China."

In the article it becomes clear that in order to protect your invention it is essential to file for a patent application and in order to enforce your patent to register it at the customs.

Of course more Chinese inventions, brands and creative works are copied by foreign companies.
According Ms Lin, the procuratorate of Haidian district in Beijing revealed that trademark infringements represent 95 percent of all IPR cases. Of these cases 30 percent involved counterfeiting of the trademarks of local brands.

Read Ms Lin's article here.
continue reading ...