Showing posts with label Hermes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hermes. Show all posts

Monday, April 04, 2011

IP Dragon Checks International Clothes Market in Beijing: "Waterbedding" Effect of Trademark Enforcement

Building of the International Clothes Market 
While all eyes are fixed on Silk Market in Beijing, IP Dragon focuses its attention to the International Clothes Market in Beijing to check whether counterfeit apparel and bags were on sale.

Let's first take a look at the notorious Silk Market. Tim Smith of Rouse Beijing sent his intern Dominic to take a look at Silk Market. He witnessed that the Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce (AIC) had put a notice on the wall in Chinese that stated that merchants in Silk Street that were caught selling counterfeit items bearing a list of foreign brands, including Prada, Chanel, Burberry, Givenchy, Boss, Hermes, Miu Miu, North Face would be subject to administrative penalties. If the landlord knowingly permitted the sale of any such goods they were held contributorily liable and it was made clear that they be subject to administrative measures and criminal punishment. It was Dominic's observation that no counterfeit products of the trademarked brands that had filed lawsuits against the landlord, and whose names were mentioned on the notice were on display in Silk Street.

IP Dragon went to the International Clothes Market (金jin 开kai 俐li 德de 国guo 际ji 服fu 装
zhuang 市shi 场chang), which is located near the Beijing Zoo. That it is not hard to find counterfeit products at the second floor of the International Clothes Market is an understatement: counterfeit use of famous foreign brands is omnipresent. From adidas sweaters with hood for 20 RenMinBi (a little over 3 dollar) to North Face jackets for 80 Renminbi. Robe di Kappa, Calvin Klein (but then written as Calvin Kiein), Levi's, Björn Borg. I am not sure whether the design of the pattern on the adidas sweater was also copied. The counterfeit manufacturers also expand the model and product range of famous brands. For example a non-existent LV bag model and “Louis Vuitton” underwear. Text continues below.

The area was patrolled by a police officer. But it seemed not to be his priority. The landlord liability cases in 2005, 2006 and 2010 have shown that private companies can do something about the counterfeit problems at markets by suing the landlord (owner) of the market and the second-hand landlord (the market management company). Check the excellent presentation of Dr. James Luo, Managing Partner of Beijing's Xiang Kun Law Firm about the subject, here. The question is whether the problem just moves away from a place where it seems contained to other places, just like a waterbed. Are the counterfeit products of these active brands not sold in Silk Street, but via a plethora of other channels?


"Calvin Kiein"



"North Face" jackets for 80 RMB

"adidas" sweater for 20 RMB

Robe di Kappa
continue reading ...

Monday, March 14, 2011

Beijing's Silk Market



IP Komodo’s friend Tim Smith of Rouse was curious to know what was happening at the famous Beijing Silk Market. He asked his intern Dominic to take a look and here is what they found. Large public notices appear around the market issued by the Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce, concerning counterfeit goods. The notices (in Chinese only) state that any merchants in Silk Street caught selling any items bearing any of a finite list of famous foreign brands (Prada, Chanel, Burberry, Givenchy, Boss, Hermes, Miu Miu, North Face etc.) would be subject to administrative penalties, as all such articles would be counterfeit. Further, the management of the Silk Street shopping plaza would, if it was shown to have knowingly permitted the sale of any such goods, be subject to administrative measures and criminal punishment. These are all brands which we believe were involved in civil litigation against the Silk Market management.

There are also large red banners in Chinese and English reading "protect intellectual property rights - be law-abiding vendors" and "embrace national brand - respect intellectual property right". There were red sign boards displayed above the aisles every few metres or so in English advising customers that if they had any concerns with the merchandise they had purchased they could contact the customer service desk, call a telephone hotline or send the details of their complaint to a dedicated email address.

But a look around revealed many articles from jackets and shirts to belts and watches bearing brands such as D&G, Giorgio Armani, Adidas, Nike, Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie, all on unabashed display. Few of the brands listed in the notice, however, were seen. Coincidentally these all appear to be companies which were plaintiffs in civil court actions against the market in recent years. The result of the cases is that those brands who went to court appear to have succeeded in proving secondary liability against the landlord, so he ensures their products are not sold there. But those who have not litigated do not appear to be in that position. Further pending litigation is seeking to widen the landlord's liability further.

Guest post by IP Komodo Dragon
continue reading ...

Monday, February 07, 2011

What Is the Superlative of Contributory Liability?... Local State Supervision Liability?

Managing IP magazine, had a link to an interesting China Daily article, see here in which a State Administration for Radio Film and Television (SARFT) official was quoted as saying that it is "working on the establishment of an internet audio-visual programs industry association (..)". The application has been submitted and it now waiting approval to the Ministry of Civil Affairs.

Also interesting in the article is that the government intensified supervision over major internet enterprises, a precautionary move to stop piracy spreading. "In 2009, the number websites being supervised by local copyright authorities, reached 3,029. They include Taobao.com, Baidu, Sohu and Youku."

That means that if infringement still took place in that period, it was under local copyright supervision.

Taobao is China's e-commerce platform. And where eBay is sued by trademark holders in the U.S. (Tiffany), France (Hermès and LVHM) and Belgium (Lancôme), in China Taobao was sued for example by Puma; read Lee, Won Hee Elaine. 'Online Auction Sites and Inconsistencies: A Case Study of France, China, and the United States.' American University Intellectual Property Brief, Spring 2010, 50-57, here.

Jesse London (who is the managing editor of Cornell Journal of International Law), wrote an interesting note on China's Approaches to Intellectual Property Infringement on the Internet for the Internet Journal of Rutgers School of Law, volume 38, 2010-2011, read here. Mr London is comparing the IFPI cases against Baidu and Yahoo China and comes to the conclusion that the degree of good faith of the online service provider is crucial, but so is the degree of reasonableness of the demands of the trademark holder by insisting in the measures against infringement.

Youku (the Chinese equivalent of YouTube) had a lot of pirated Hollywood movies. But I checked a few times and they indeed seem to have cleaned up a lot of copyright piracy.
continue reading ...