Showing posts with label Lenovo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lenovo. Show all posts

Monday, January 02, 2012

Smartphone Patent War 2012: Chinese Alliance vs International Brands

The battlefield of patents are more and more the place where competitors are vying for market share. China has become the world's largest market for smart phones in the third quarter of 2011, according to Strategy Analytics. Some Chinese smartphone makers, including Lenovo, ZTE, TCL, Coolpad and Konka joined forces to protect themselves against the rising number of claims of patent infringement by international smartphone manufacturers, such as Apple, Nokia and Microsoft, and to dominate China's domestic market.
Huawei has around 65,000 patents and also ZTE has a substantial number of patents for wireless communication technologies. According to Erica Yen and Steve Shen of Digitimes many Chinese smart phone makers develop localized interfaces and even operation systems, see here.


Chinese smartphone manufacturers also launch their products via China-based telecom carriers and social networking websites operators, via dual branding. HTC and Sony Ericsson grew rapidly because their Android models were popular in major cities of east and south China, according to Linda Sui of Strategy Analytics. If China Telecom will launch the CDMA iPhone 4S early next year, Ms Sui expects Apple's market share to peak. Globally Nokia is still number one, closely followed by Samsung and Apple.
continue reading ...

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

How To Transform The Image of Chinese Brands? Hint ... It's Not Product Placements

Product Placements 
Some movies have become a series of commercials with a story line. Thanks to the lucrative business of product placements. Transformers (变形金刚) 3 which opened in cinemas in China on July 21, 2011 shows an abundance of Chinese brands:
  • Yili: Shuhua Milk
  • Meters/bonwe: M-Tee
  • Lenovo: Ideacentre A series
  • TCL (The Creative Life): HDTV range
Yili milk is trying to transform its image with the product placement after the melamine induced total recall in 2008, see here. 

Read Daniel Gilroy's Advertising China Smack article about it here.

However, companies that really want to build a great reputation globally and domestically should focus even more on quality programmes, in order to make the quality of their products consistent, and they should be able to guarantee the safety of the complete supply chain, coupled to superior service that informs their customers about quality, the supply chain and the points of sale.  
continue reading ...

Friday, August 05, 2011

Update on CYBERsitter, LLC v. The People's Republic of China et al

Remember Green Dam Youth Escort? Short reminder: the Chinese government ordered computer manufacturers to bundle computers sold in China with software that could filter pornography by July 2009. It postponed the deadline because of pressure by foreign computer manufacturers. In August it backtracked the obligation to pre-install the software (Japanese companies Sony and Toshiba, and Acer from Taiwan voluntarily installed the software). It now only required schools and internet cafes to install the filter software. Soon it became clear that the software, called Green Dam Youth Escort. 

Now on January 5th, 2010, CYBERsitter LLC sued the following Chinese, Taiwanese and Japanese parties:
  • The People's Republic of China ("a foreign state", as can be read in the original lawsuit)
  • Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering Ltd.
  • Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy Ltd.
  • Sony Corporation
  • Lenovo Group Limited
  • Toshiba Corporation
  • Acer Incorporated
  • ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
  • Benq Corporation
  • Haier Group Corporation
  • DOES 1-10
The complaint at the California Central District Court is based on what allegation? Copyright infringement: CYBERsitter's allegation was that Green Dam Youth Escort makes use of approximately 3,000 programming lines of CYBERsitter. It demands damages worth 2,257,175,000 US dollar, based on 56.5 million unauthorised copies in China as of early June 2009, multiplied by 39.95 US dollar per copy. Rich Kuslan of AsiaBizBlog (the web's first China business and law blog) provides the lawsuit document here. Mr Kuslan provides another lawsuit document of CYBERsitter versus CBS Interactive, Inc, and DOES 1-10 here.

Michael Kan of IDG news gives us the update on the case. August 1, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the motions brought by the China-based Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering and Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy. Their argument that the California court had no jurisdiction over the case was dismissed by Judge Gary A. Feess, because the companies had allegedly committed the criminal acts knowing that CYBERsitter was based in California and that its business there could be damaged.

Chinese electronics vendor Haier argued, according to Mr Kan, that the case's key defendant, the Chinese government, was immune from a U.S. court's jurisdiction. However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):
(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign state has waived its immunity either explicitly or by implication, notwithstanding any withdrawal of the waiver which the foreign state may purport to effect except in accordance with the terms of the waiver; (2) in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States;
continue reading ...

Friday, April 08, 2011

Sue Where The Assets Are: Reflex Packaging is suing former client Lenovo for patent infringement in US


By Michiel Tjoe-Awie

Reflex Packaging (Reflex) was supplying patented thermoformed cushions to pack Lenovo's computers. In 2008 Lenovo asked Reflex to remove their name and patent number from the packages. Reflex refused to do so, only to discover later that Lenovo continued to use the same patented package which were allegedly produced without there consent.

The Epoch Times' Matthew Robertson editor quoted Forrest Smith as saying: “The commentary from our counsel over in China was (…) frustrating, which was that your odds of suing successfully in China because of this are very low, because Lenovo is one of the ‘great sons of China.’ That was the message that I got back.” Lenovo is a former state-owned company, but still has ties with powerful Communist Part of China people.

The advice given above led to Reflex filing a lawsuit at the California Northern Disctrict Court in March 2010. Lenovo, which acquired the personal computer division of IBM in 2005, has many assets in the U.S since it is the fourth biggest computer manufacturer in the world and sells a lot of computers in the U.S.

Read more here.

Text Michiel Tjoe-Awie
continue reading ...

Friday, June 18, 2010

Professor Llewelyn: "Leverage Your IP Rights"

This Morning IP Dragon attended a breakfast seminar by Professor David Llewelyn (IP Academy of Singapore and Of Counsel at White & Case in Singapore). Even though it was quite early, many people interested in how to maximise the use of IP did show up at the office of White & Case in Central, Hong Kong. Professor Llewelyn's presentation was about Intellectual Property Rights as a Balance Sheet Asset. In other words how to commercialise your intellectual property rights. Below is a brief impression:

Professor Llewelyn rightly made the point that IP is not just a legal tool. That the IP assets are fast becoming a focus of the investment world. The securitization of intellecutal property rights is in Asia nascent. Article 26 Copyright Law 2010 even mentions this possibility explicitly: "Where a copyright is used as a pledge, both the pledgor and pledgee shall register the pledge with the copyright administrative authorities of the State Council."

China's leadership understands that it has to climb the value chain in order to continue its economic growth. And IP is protecting this added value. Professor Llewelyn covered the different kinds of intellectual property rights (he can cover all IPR in one hour, see here) and explained the origin of patent (to disclose the information in exchange for a temporary monopoly) as the opposite of latent (which one could apply to trade secrets).

Llewelyn described how Li Ning (athletic shoes and sporting goods) used a combination of the swoosh of Nike, the stripes of Adidas and the wave of Puma and using the slogan "Everything is possible" (while Adidas uses the slogan "Impossible is nothing", read an article by Drog Poleg on Danwei here) and still gets away with it.

About trademarks Professor Llewelyn said that many companies did not pick a very good name. He illustrated this by drawing the travails of China's computer manufacturer Lenovo, who used be called Legend. But this laudatory name was very hard to trademark in other countries. So it had to rename itself to Lenovo (Legend + Novo), which must have been a costly operation.

He made the distinction between copyrights which give the copyright holder the right to exclude others from copying their work, but is not giving a monopoly to the holder as is the case with patents.

In China most companies have utility patents which are not examined, therefore cheap, but really do not tell competitors anything about whether they are valid or not. Professor Llewelyn told about the IP game, of patent trolls (non-practising entities), licensing and sub licensing etc. which, of course, is a serious game, because a lot can be at stake. Valuation of IP can be very difficult. But it is getting more important, since many companies start to park their IP assets in "tax neutral" jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Jersey etc.
You should know first what you have. Then use what you have. Leverage your IP rights.

Professor Llewelyn made a case for using IP strategically. And to bring IP out of the marketing and legal departments into the boardroom. One of the board should own the IP issue internally and deal with the IP challenges.

I am looking forward to read his book: 'Invisible Gold in Asia', which deals about the same crucial subject matter that only becomes more important for each and every company: Creating wealth through intellectual property.
continue reading ...

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Cybersitting Claims 2.25 Billion US Dollar For Allegedly Pirated Code in Green Dam

It was the Chinese government's plan to demand of computer manufacturers to pre-install this filter programme against pornography and violence, however after a public outcry this was not made mandatory. But it keeps coming back in the news. After Solid Oak, read here, who sent cease and desist letters to Dell and Hewlett Packard, because the filter system Green Dam allegedly had stolen code from them, it is now another US software company's turn: Cybersitting. The Californian company Cybersitting, is sueing Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering and Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy and seven computer makers, including Lenovo, Acer and Sony, and the Chinese government, for pirating allegedly 3,000 lines of its code in the software of Green Dam Youth Escort. The case was filed Tuesday in the Federal District Court in Los Angeles and Cybersitter claims 2.25 billion US dollars.

Michael Wines with David Barboza contributing, wrote a good article about it for the New York Times, read here.

continue reading ...