Showing posts with label China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue. Show all posts

Friday, April 15, 2011

Sino-U.S. Investment Treaty: A Little BIT For You and Me

Photo "Shaking Hands" by Nicola Corboy (Some rights reserved)

In May, 2011, the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue will be resumed in Washington. Daniel Michaeli, research associate at the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank and publisher, opines in the Huffington Post that the U.S. should negotiate a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) with China: “China has already signed 120 investment treaties around the world, including with Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. The most recent ones have clauses providing foreign investors with the option to resort to binding international arbitration for intellectual property disputes, if Chinese local courts cannot resolve such issues satisfactorily (as, indeed, too often they cannot).

According to Mr Michaeli jobs do not necessarily follow U.S. investments to China: “Recent data indicates that U.S.-based multinational corporations locate more than half of their employees in the United States, where they have 70 percent of their operations and spend 87 percent of their research and development budget.

Read Mr Michaeli's article here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

IP in China: Tight Rope Dancing Act

(Picture taken in South Korea by S. Straub)

Xiao Liang, researcher with the Institute of World Economics and
Politics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, urges to balance all interests when dealing with the issue of IPR protection:

"1. The relationship between securing national interests and fulfilling international obligations. This means they should strike a balance between protecting sovereignty and being a responsible stakeholder.
A country's IPR protection can only be as good as a its economic and social development. The subjects and focus of such protection change in different stages of development. No one should take a country's economic and social development out of the equation when talking about IPR protection.
2. The relationship between IPR protection (monopoly) and market competition. We should balance the promotion of creativity and competitiveness.
3. The relationship between IPR protection (monopoly) and the public interest. This refers to the need to balance the interests of IPR owners and that of society as a whole. We should oppose both the violation of IPR and violation of the public interest by abusing IPR."

Read more of Xiao's article for the China Daily (via People's Daily Online) about the second round of China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue here.
continue reading ...