Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 04, 2011

Research on Equipment Manufacturing Industry China: IPR Significant Impact on Transition From Imitative To Independent Innovation


The Journal of Technology Management in China (Vol. 6 No. 3, 2011, p 257-266) has an interesting article  A study of the evolutionary path of technological innovation modes in the equipment manufacturing
industry of China written by Yuan Yi-jun and Lv Cui-jie (Department of Economics, Dalian University of Technology). 


Yuan and Lv use evolutionary game theory to research what hinders the transition from imitative innovation to independent innovation in the strategically important equipment manufacturing industry. 

The authors come to the conclusion that the obstacle factors from imitative to independent innovation are internal and external mutation conditions:

  • Internal: path dependence and lack of benefit incentives;
  • External: lack of fiscal support and lack of intellectual property protection

Yuan and Lv: "The results show that the pursuit of the benefit (innovation return or above-average profits), as an internal mutation condition, is the most fundamental motivation for independent innovation, while policy incentives, as the external mutation conditions, have a significant impact on the evolutionary transition from imitative innovation to independent innovation in equipment manufacturing enterprises."
continue reading ...

Thursday, September 15, 2011

What R&D Is Being Done And Where In China: An Inventorisation Of Science Parks

Richard Jun Lin, Xavier Xie (analysers), Zhuo Zhang, Jerold Wang and Chris Hartshorn (data contributors) have worked on a project to inventorise China's 1,531 provincial and national-level industry parks: 'Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Navigating China’s Industry Park Innovation Engine'. It "reveals the need for a specific focus on 87 university science parks and tough decisions on how broadly efforts should focus geographically." Read more here.

It would be interesting to know what the IP climate is in all of these places. Are there schemes that encourage/subsidise patents and is there attention to the protection and enforcement of IPRs?
continue reading ...

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Sobering Statistics Put China's Innovation Into Perspective

In the graphical perspective,
things become smaller if the distance
from the observer increases
Professor Anil Gupta and Haiyan Wang, writers of the book 'Getting China and India right', put China's innovation statistics into perspective.

Patent filings in 2008
  • U.S.A. 400,769 filings
  • Japan 502,054 filings
  • China 203,481 filings
Gupta and Wang have a point when they argue that the Chinese inventions patented outside China are a more objective measure than the ones registered by State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO).
The most compelling statistic is the number for triadic patents or triadic patent families (patents that origin from one country but that are patented by the European Patent Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office and the Japan Patent Office).

Triadic patent families according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in 2008
  • Europe 14,525 filings
  • U.S.A. 14,399 filings
  • Japan 13,446 filings
  • China 473 filings
See the Compendium on Patent Statistics for 2008 here (pdf) on page 6. 

However, I would argue that these patent filings are not the best measure. Patent registrations would be a far more better indication of patent quality. 

Professor Gupta and Mr Wang wrote: in 2010 China accounted for
  • 20% of the world's population
  • 9% of the world's GDP
  • 12% of the world's R&D expenditure
  • 1% of the patent filings with or patents granted by any of the leading patent offices outside China. 
  • 50 % of the China-origin patents were granted to subsidiaries of foreign multinationals   
Professor Gupta's and Mr Wang's Wall Street Journal article 'China's Innovation Is A Paper Tiger' can be read here and should not be confused with the title of my thesis 'Paper Tiger Or Roaring Dragon, China's TRIPs Implementations and Enforcement'.

UPDATE August 2, 2011: 
Joff Wild, editor of Intellectual Asset Management gives an update since 2008. In short: the growth in the number of China's triadic patent filings/grants paints a rosy picture. However China's innovation prospect is much bleaker. On this I concur with Mr Wild. Read more about the relation between innovation and intellectual property and innovation and censorship here.
continue reading ...

Friday, July 15, 2011

Innovation: "Paradoxes, Google and China"

Google and China have found each other in a marriage of convenience, in order to serve the one god they both live by: innovation. This article deals with censorship and intellectual property. Two of the biggest challenges that the internet present to the legal community. The main characters are two of the biggest actors on the internet stage: Google and China. Google wants to offer all the information available to everyone, while not doing evil. China interprets having all the information available to everyone as an evil that will lead to instability.


Download the chapter here of Friedmann, Danny, Paradoxes, Google and China - How Censorship Can Harm and Intellectual Property Can Harness Innovation (July 1, 2011), which is a chapter of the book: Aurelio Lopez-Tarruella (Ed), Google and the Law, IT and the Law Series, TMC Asser, Forthcoming. 
continue reading ...

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

Innovative Copycats? MIIT Vice Minister's Remark On Piggybacking of Innovative Copycats

3 articles to go: IP Dragon on its way to its 1,000th article

Adam Smith of World Trademark Review wrote a column about China's Vice Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) Yang Xueshan, who made a controversial remark: that the innovative elements of copycat products should be protected and encouraged. Mr Smith interviewed yours truly:

"Danny Friedmann, an IP rights consultant in China and author of IP Dragon, supports Yang in this, but disagrees with his reported statement that knockoff products should not be labelled as piggybacking on another's intellectual property without proper assessment. "If you base your innovation on existing proprietary technology or design or a brand, it is piggybacking," said Friedmann. "That does not say that the innovation is not of a high standard or not sorely needed. If you steal paint and canvas and then paint a beautiful piece of art, you are both a thief and an artist. Yang wants to stress only the latter.""

Read Adam Smith's column here.
continue reading ...

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

More Chinese Trademarks More Vehicles of Innovation = More Innovation?

China Hearsay's Stan Abrams takes a critical look at statistics about trademark registrations in China. He is rightly filleting the alleged relationship between increased trademark registrations and a growing awareness of trademark protection among Chinese entreprises, read more here.

However it could be said that the growth of trademark registrations in China would indicate two things:

- More companies want to build their own brand;
- Brands are a way to exploit innovation. So you can have a patented invention, which needs a trademark if you want to sell. The question, however, remains: if there are more vehicles of commerce for innovative products, will there be more innovation? In other words:

More trademarks equals more innovation?

多商標 = 多技術創新?
continue reading ...

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Promising News: China and UK Fast-Track Green Patent Applications

Today the UK will start fast-tracking green patent applications, and China will follow suit. IAM Magazine 's Joff Wild has a very interesting blog about it called 'China and UK to fast-track green patent applications, according to British IP Minister'. That could be the best news since the WIPO chose "promoting green innovation" as its theme for this year's World Intellectual Property Day (last April 26th). Read Mr Wild's blog here.  
continue reading ...

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

"Lax IPR Keeps Chinese Companies Lazy In Terms of R&D"

BusinessWeek runs an article of Associated Press about the 'Study on the Future Opportunities and Challenges in EU-China Trade and Investment Relations 2006-2010' prepared by Philip Bartley of the Emerging Markets Group consultancy, for the European Commission.
Bartley said that China would also benefit from opening up its market, mentioning EU and U.S. concerns over copyright and piracy enforcement. "Lax intellectual property rights in may ways keep Chinese companies lazy in terms of their own research and development."


Read the BusinessWeek article here.


The study is comprised of 11 sectoral issues (Machinery, Chemicals, etc.) and 1 about IPR, exploring China's IP environment, which was written by Dr. Paul Ranjard of UNIFAB Beijing and Benoît Misonne of the EU-China Trade Project.

See the complete study here and the chapter about IPR in China here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

China Outspends Japan in Innovation; IP in China Will Profit

Stan Abrams, Lehman, Lee and Xu lawyer and writer of China Hearsay, wrote an article about China's newest milestone: that it outspends Japan in research and development.

It is expected IP protection and enforcement in China will profit most. Rightly so, because self interest is one of the best motivators.

Read Abrams article here.
continue reading ...