Saturday, May 27, 2006

How To Combat Chinese Piracy in the Car Wash Manufacturing Business Without IP Litigation

Hamel Manufacturing is a family business in Waterloo, Nebraska that manufactures car wash fixtures. "The company spent the last two years fighting a firm that uses a Chinese outsourcing company to produce a knockoff version of its flex wand. Although their brand is trademarked, they could not afford to go to court because of the hight costs of intellectual property litigation.
To combat the competition, the company developed a lower-cost version of the wand that could compete with the price of the knock-off." Besides, they got support from loyal customers. Read more here.
It seems to me that these mom and pop companies should organise so that they will have the financial means to fight an intellectual property infringer collectively.
continue reading ...

Silk Alley Market Case Based On Unimplemented Regulation?

Remember the Silk Alley Market case? (refresh your mind here). On what law was this very important decision based? According to the China Law Digest, a bilingual monthly web digest, the "Assistant Director of the Center for Intellectual Property Rights of the China Academy of Social Sciences, Li Shunde, said that the statute the Beijing High Court used was not a new regulation but has never been truly implemented in the past."

I take it that this quote is referring to the Silk Alley Market case and not to the Louis Vuitton versus Beijing Chaowaimen Shopping Mall Limited Company case that was also mentioned in the article. I would really like to know more about the aforementioned statute, that supposedly was never been truly implemented in the past. Anybody?

Read the China Law Digest article here (free subscription). And why doesn't the China Law Digest use links?
continue reading ...

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

IFPI HK Launches Chinese Parents' Guide to P2P and Legal Downloading

After focusing on children, read here, the HK government's Intellectual Property Department (IPD) and IFPI HK are focusing on parents to educate them about intellectual property online. IFPI and IPD made a guide called Young People, Music and the Internet. But is a guide enough to catch up with their children that outsurf their parents by a big margin? When the parents have time to read the guide, if at all, the children will already have learned a few new tricks. Read more here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Software Piracy in China Has Dropped To 86 Percent

The Business Software Alliance (BSA) said China dropped four points between 2004 and 2005 from 90 to 86 percent.

This year marks the second year in a row where there has been a decrease in the PC software piracy rate in China. This is particularly significant, considering the vast PC growth taking place in the Chinese IT market,” said (BSA president and CEO) Holleyman." Read more here.

Eric Pfanner of the IHT nuanced the disadvantages of software piracy in Step in the 'right direction' on piracy because of the network advantages. Bill Gates said in 1998:

"As long as they're going to steal it, we want them to steal ours," he said of Chinese users, according to Fortune magazine. "They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade."

In the mean time that decade is almost over. However, Gates is beginning to find innovative ways to collect revenues. See here.

Read Pfanner's IHT article here.
continue reading ...

Anti-piracy Initiative Microsoft-Lenovo: Pre-paid Cards for PCs

'Microsoft and Lenovo Team Up on New 'Pay As You Go' PCs for Emerging Markets; Companies to Launch Market Trials in China and India Using Microsoft FlexGo (TM) Technology' wrote
TMCnet.

"Consumers will be able to purchase a Lenovo desktop PC by paying about half of its street price up-front, and paying the balance over time through the purchase of prepaid cards from Lenovo."

Microsoft and Lenovo collaborate "on the Lenovo Innovation Centers in the U.S., China and India; the ThinkPad X41 Tablet PC; and the Genuine Windows (R) Experience Program to combat counterfeiting and piracy in China."

Genuine Windows is an online upgrade to an existing software program that checks if the software is genuine. If it is not, it will start warning the user untill he changes the pirated software for a genuine version. Microsoft collaborates also with Founder on this. See here.

Read TMCnet article here. Stan Beer of Australian iTWire wrote about it too here. Eric Bangeman of Ars Technica here.
continue reading ...

Monday, May 22, 2006

Reply of Pierre Haski on the Authorisation of the Ma Yan Diary Publication

April 25th, IP Dragon posted an article about a Chinese girl Ma Yan who made a diary that was given to Pierre Haski by her mother to edit it. Haski made it into a book, which was made into a Chinese propaganda movie according to Haski, who is trying to stop foreign film festivals to show it, because it does not represent the book. At the end of the blog IP Dragon wrote: However, since Ma Yan's mother is not the author of the work, the preliminary question should be: Did Ma Yan gave authorisation to publish the work in the first place? Read the article and relevant provisions of Chinese personal rights here.

Pierre Haski answered this question by commenting to the IP Dragon blog:

"My name is Pierre Haski and as I'm involved in the topic you are discussing, here is the answer to the last question you ask : Ma Yan did not authorize her mother to give me her diary, but this gesture saved her and her family. However, Ma Yan authorized the publication of her diary as a book, she signed a contract and receives royalties as a co-author. She is giving back 25% of her rights to a foundation helping other poor kids to go to school : 1200 of them helped this school year in Southern Ningxia. All things that the authors and producers of the film refused to do : they would not pay a cent, let alone to the authors, but just to help the effort that was born out of the diary, to help poor kids access education. That's all this is about.Best regards. And thanks for your interest for this story." PH pierre haski 05.15.06 - 6:27 pm

Thank you Pierre for answering the question.
continue reading ...

Anecdotal Evidence or Urban Legend?

Dutch author Henk Schulte Nordholt wrote the book De Chinacode ontcijferd, which means The China Code Deciphered, about the rise of China. I flash read this title, let's say inspired by the Da Vinci Code, to see if anything was mentioned about intellectual property in China. I found an anecdote. However, without any real names, dates or more specific facts. I'll try to paraphrase it anyway:

In the mid nineties, a Dutch producer of devices went to an exhibition in Beijing. One of the panels of the apperatus was bend during voyage to the exhibition. It could not be fixed, so the producer exhibited the device like that. The next year at the exhibition the Dutch producer found out that a competitor was showing an exact copy of his device, including the bend panel. When asked by the Dutch producer why one of the panels was bend the competitor could not explain its function and said that it's just the state of the art.

This anecdote may well be true, but if you cannot mention the facts it might as well be an urban legend. Missed opportunity for Schulte Nordholt. On the other hand it could serve as an example that is would not hurt to insert some errors in exhibition models and blue prints.
continue reading ...

Saturday, May 20, 2006

AmCham-China: IP Protection Insufficient

Dan Harris of China Law Blog has an interesting post about a survey about IP protection, or rather the lack of it in China by the American Chamber of Commerce in China. See here.
continue reading ...

Friday, May 19, 2006

46 percent of Pirated Goods Seized by German Customs are from China and HK

Andreas Cremer of Bloomberg wrote about Angela Merkel's trip to China. The German chancellor talked about the MAGLEV, in the story nothing was mentioned about any IP controversy. Read more about it here.

On top of the complaints of the German business community about continuing infringements of their IPRs, Germany's DIHK industry and trade chambers, which represent more than 3 million companies in Germany, announced that last year 46 percent of pirated goods seized by German customs came from China and HK.
Read Cremer's article here.
continue reading ...

Hanxin Chip Scandal, Drama at Shanghai Jian Tong University

Hao Xin wrote for Science Magazine the article Scientific Misconduct:Invention of China's Homegrown DSP Chip Dismissed as a Hoax.

To its embarassment Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) found out serious "falsification and deception in the research and development of the Hanxin series of chips led by Chen Jin," the dean of SJTU.

The Shanghai government named Chen Jin CEO of Shanghai Silicon Intellectual Property Exchange, a platform established in 2003 with $3.75 million in municipal funds for trading semiconductor rights.

Read more here. About IP blogged about it here and here.
continue reading ...

Chinese R&D Budget to Grow, Public IP Knowledge Contest

At the "Think Smart R&D and Innovation Roundtable" held in Shanghai on Wednesday the results of a survey about the allocation of investments in R&D conducted by Economist Intelligence Unit for ThomsonScientific were revealed:
48.15% of companies stated they will spend the biggest share of its R&D spend in China, ahead of India (24.07%), US (21.69%) and Europe (20.99%). Up to 40% of respondents cited the Chinese Government's active support for R&D as China's greatest asset. The survey polled 165 senior executives in Asia-Pacific (including 37% from China) and was conducted inApril-May 2006. Read more here.

Scientific Thomson last month announced a sponsorship with SIPO, read more here.
Together with SIPO's China Intellectual Property News (CIPN) they launched an IP Knowledge Contest. "Questions vary from piracy restrictions to time limits for the protection of an invention, with results due later in 2006."
Read more here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

O My, China Is Counterfeiting Bishops

After China appointed a panchen lama in 1995, it recently ordained two bishops, unauthorised by the respective religious leaders; the dalai lama and the pope, or so to say, the right holders. If for example the religious figure of a bishop could be protected by some intellectual property law, what kind of intellectual property law would apply? Even if you consider the post of bishop as original and with the stamp of the creator, its copyright would already long time be expired. If you think the bishop is a catholic invention and you want to patent it, it would not work; the novelty requirement would prevent it, as the invention would already have been prior art for centuries. However, you might regard a bishop as a brand, that could be protected by trademark and be renewed for eternity. The reason why the atheist Chinese Communist Party is de facto placing itself on the holy see to ordain as they please is the same reason why the Vatican wants to have this exclusive right: to keep fully centralised control. The advice for CCP and Vatican would be the same; get a trademark. On second thought, these brands are probably well-known brands by now. And China, why stop there? Why not appoint ambassadors to China of every country? They could all live in Windows of the World in Shenzhen. Its slogan: "give me a day and we will show you a splendid world."
continue reading ...

Saturday, May 13, 2006

HK ISP's Must Give Personal Data Of File-Sharers, 16-year-old Arrested

Three Hong Kong movie companies; Hero China International Ltd, One Hundred Years of Film Co. and Applause Pictures Ltd., demanded that the internet service providers Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd., i-Cable Webserve Ltd., PCCW IMS Ltd. and Hutchison Global Communications Ltd give the names of users who download movies online using file-sharing technology. After the movie companies' victory in court the ISP's have been given three weeks to comply.

A 16-year- old student was arrested by the Anti-Internet Piracy Team (which was formed in 2000 and it has since solved nine Internet piracy cases, which has led to the arrest of 13 people), because he operated a personal website that offered 600 pirated songs for free download.

Read Jack Myers' Earth Times article here.
continue reading ...

Friday, May 12, 2006

Hailong Company Suggests Microsoft to Opt for the Warner Bros Strategy

People's Daily Online quoted Yan Xiaohong, deputy chief of the National Copyright Administration saying that China will not make any discount on the principles and goals on its IPR Protection and that it will be a long and arduous process.

Representatives of the computer industry gave their opinion on the Pre-installed Authorized Operating System, issued by Ministery of Information Industry, National Copyrights Administration and Ministry of Commerce on April 6, read more here.

"Hailong Company suggests that Microsoft should slash the price of its software according to China's situation. He said If Microsoft's Windows system could be reduced to 100 to 15 yuan, more than 50 percent of Chinese consumers would like to buy the copyrighted ones." This may be not so strange since Microsoft's profit margin is about 95 percent on software. And it might be a good idea, because to price elasticity. Warner Bros. is trying this strategy, read here.

Read the People's Daily Online article here.
continue reading ...

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Fake Viagra Producer Sentenced To 10 Years Imprisonment

Monday the Shaoxing Intermediate People's Court in Zhejiang province sentenced Wang Weiping to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of 2 million yuan (US$250,000) in a first ruling, because of the production of fake Viagra and Cialis (both anti-impotence drugs).

Yang Zhonghua of Xinhua wrote:
"A total of 381,000 fake Viagra pills and 1.4 million counterfeit Cialis tablets, worth a combined total of 241 million yuan (US$29 million) on the market, were also seized from workshops at Kangdeli Health Care, according to a release from the court."

Wang established another manufacturing base at Guannan in Jiangsu Province.

Read Yang's Xinhua article here. Hat tip to Jeremy Goldkorn of Danwei.
continue reading ...

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Is the Joint Investigation By Japanese and Chinese Electronics Industry Groups At 'China's Silicon Valley' Mild Or Ineffective?

The Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA) and the China Electronic Chamber of Commerce (CECE) have announced they will do a joint investigation in Beijing's Zhongguancun district, China's Silicon Valley. They will target a certain building with about 500 electronics appliance stores. The groups will investigate three to six items, such as batteries and USB memory storage devices. However, the question is how effective the research will be because they will notify stores in advance of target items.

Read the JiJi News story published on Mainichi Daily News here.
continue reading ...

The Infringement of Copyright of the English Learning Products and that of the Personality Of Big Mountain

"Hebei Education Press (HBEP) recently sued Shanghai-based English learning product provider OZing and its distributors San Cai Digital and OZing Beijing in Beijing No.2 Intermediary People's Court for copyright infringement, Beijing Star Daily reports."
Source Pacific Epoch.

HBEP is accusing OZing of plagiarizing its English textbooks and tapes in its English learning machines. The alleged infringer, OZing is endorsed by Canadian Mark Rowswell, who is well known in China as Da Shan (大山). HBEP demands that OZing publishes an apology in China Book Business Report and China Xinwen Chuban Bao and pay 11.09 million Yuan in compensation.

One thing is it to infringe on someone's copyright, but what about infringing on someone's personality? This seems to be a fact of life for Da Shan a.k.a. Mark Rowswell. Read here how ordinary non-Chinese pass of as Da Shan and seem to get away with it.
Read DD of Talk Talk China here.
continue reading ...

Coming Up This Autumn: EC's Vision On IP in China

This coming autumn there will be a EU-China summit. EU's trade commissioner Peter Mandelson will be presenting a Communication on trade and investment in China which will analyse the impact of China on the global economy, and how the Union should respond.
Mandelson: "It will focus, in particular, on key challenges such as intellectual property, market access issues and investment opportunities. Europe must get China right – as a threat, an opportunity and prospective partner. I hope our Communication will spark a lively debate, both within the EU and with China."
Read Mandelson's speech here.

The European Commission has just launched a public consultation designed to form part of its forthcoming major strategic review of trade and economic relations between the EU and China.

Read here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

How To Assemble A Bilingual Brand Name In China

Dror Poleg of Danwei has a nice post about the bilingual brand names of Ikea and Aika.
Read it here.
continue reading ...

Monday, May 08, 2006

Beijing AIC: Old Wine In New Bags: Scarce Stats, However, Purchasing Advice

In February IP Dragon posted about Baijiu counterfeiters that prey on drunkards, read more here. Now China CSR has a story about Beijing wine stores that sell counterfeit wines.

The Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce (AIC) conducted a check in 400 shops, before the May break. It is too bad that the article didn't supply more statistics, such as the percentage of counterfeit wines. It only gave the absolut number of confiscated 3937 bottles of best-selling brands in China.

Whether or not the Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce supplied statistics, it at least advised the Beijing citizens where to buy a genuine bottle of wine:

"A representative from Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce suggests customers buy wines at big shopping malls and franchise supermarkets to better mitigate the chances of purchasing fake goods."

Read more here.
continue reading ...

Friday, May 05, 2006

Dissident Sues Law Professor For Copyright Infringement

Wang Tiancheng, a Chinese dissident, of all people, persuaded a Beijing court to accept his lawsuit against Prof. Zhou Yezhong of Wuhan University. Geoffrey York wrote an article about plagiarism in Chinese academics for the Globe & Mail.

Wang alleges that Prof. Zhou plagiarized 46 paragraphs in his latest law book, copying more than 6,000 Chinese characters. Law professor He Weifang of Beijing University wanted to expose prof. Zhou, but the China Youth Daily didn't want to run his story. Prof. He conducted a study and found out that Prof. Zhou has plagiarised at five least six scholars in his recent book.

"Academic corruption has become "a social tumour that has permeated many parts of the academic world in China," the Shanghai Daily commented. "The fundamental problem with China's academics is that few people value professionalism and many worship quick wealth.""

How big is the problem? In a survey by the Chinese Science Ministery of 180 doctorates, around 60 percent admitted copying the work of others.

Read York's article Copycats running wild in China's universities, Plagiarism by professors and students a sign of growing academic corruption here.

Read more about China's academic culture of plagiarism:
China's Academics plagued by Plagiarism here
On Chinese Patchwriting here.
continue reading ...

Thursday, May 04, 2006

China According to USTR: From Priority Foreign Country to (Top) Priority Watch List

The Trade Act of 1974 (as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the Uruguay Round Agreement Act enacted in 1994) instructed the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to identify annually those countries that deny adequate and effective protection for IPR or deny fair and equitable market access for persons that rely on intellectual property protection. Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Title 19 USC 2242) is commonly referred to as the "'Special 301" provision of the Trade Act, while Section 301, (Title 19 USC 2411) refers to the actions of the USTR.
Countries are placed into a hierarchy of categories, with the ranking of Priority Foreign Country reserved for the worst situations:

1. Priority Foreign Countries: those countries that USTR believes have the most onerous or egregious policies with the greatest adverse impact on U.S. right holders or products. These countries are subject to accelerated investigations and possible sanctions.

2. Priority Watch List: those countries which do not to provide adequate IP protection and enforcement or market access for U.S. persons relying on intellectual property protection.

3. Watch List: those countries USTR believes merit bilateral attention to address the underlying IPR problems.

Section 306 Monitoring: Being placed under Section 306 Monitoring means that the USTR can movedirectly to the application of trade sanctions against China if monitoring shows a slippage in China's enforcement of bilateral intellectual propertyrights agreements. The legal basis for section 306 monitoring is of course section 306 (Title 19, USC 2416).

Out-of-cycle Review: those countries that require further monitoring in addition to the annual review cycle.

China is climbing down the steps of vice

In 1994 China was designated a Priority Foreign Country, and remained subject to monitoring under Section 306 of the US Trade Act. Section 306 Monitoring happened because the US have bilateral agreements with China to address specific problems raised in earlier reports.

In 2005, China has been upgraded from Priority Foreign Country to Priority Watch List as a result of the Out-of-Cycle Review as it caused serious concerns about its compliance with its obligations under the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and its JCCT commitments. . Being placed under "Section 306" monitoring means that the USTR can move directly to the application of trade sanctions against China if monitoring shows a slippage in China's enforcement of bilateral intellectual property rights agreements. Infringement levels remain unacceptable high, according to USTR, so China remains in the top priority watch list category.

This year the Section 301 Report introduced monitoring virtual and physical markets: Baidu.com was mentioned as the target of infringement actions and the example was given that the search engine company was ordered by the People's Court of Haidian District in Beijing to pay RMB 68,000 (8,400 US dollar) to a music company for unauthorized downloads. Baidu appealed. Read more here and here.

Xiangyang Market of Shanghai: the Shanghai Municipal Governement said it would close on ground of rampant sale of counterfeit fashion and apparal products. See more here.

According to the USTR Beijing's Silk Street Market was cited as "perhaps the signle biggest symbol of China's IP enforcement problems." Read more here.

Yiwu Wholesale Market. Yiwu Wholesale Market reportedly sells approximately 410,000 different items, mostly consisting of bulk sales of small consumer goods. Market officials recently estimated receiving approximately 400 complaints of IPR violations from buyers in 2005. Read more here and here.

The report also examined four Chinese 'hot spots' that require increased attention and resources: Guangdong Province (counterfeit and pirate manufacturing: from low cost consumer goods, household items, clothing and optical media, to high-technology products), Beijing City (retail counterfeit and pirated goods), Zhejiang Province (distribution centre for infringing goods. City of Yiwu draw attention for distributing suspected counterfeit lighter fluid and yellow wristbands suspected of infringing the LIVESTRONG trademark of the Lance Armstrong Foundation. Other problem localities include: Ningbo, Cixi, Taizhou, and Wenzhou) and Fujian Province (large scale manufacturing, including athletic footwear companies in Jinjiang and Putian that have been the target of infringement allegations in long-running legal actions by U.S. trademark owners New Balance, Reebok, and Nike. More problem localities include Quanzhou.

Read the 2006 Section 301 Report here.

continue reading ...

Silk Market: Fakes Still Sold, Except For Olympic Mascots

Are there any fakes sold at the Beijing Silk Street Market, only a month after the ruling of the appeal case of the same name? Daniel Schearf made a reportage called Fakes Flourish in China Despite Government Promises to Halt Piracy.

Baker & McKenzie lawyer Joseph Simone said:"If China can't prove that its existing system works, the foreign governments, not just the U.S. but Japan, Europe and other countries, they're expecting the police to dramatically increase police resources," said Simone. "And, if China doesn't, we might be looking at a WTO [World Trade Organization] dispute in a year or two."

One or two years would be great timing. China is in the world's spotlight because of the Olympic Summer Games and certainly doesn't want to lose face.

"The head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently noted that counterfeit items with the Chinese Olympic mascots and logo are rare - making it clear that China can curtail piracy when it imposes stiff penalties. China issued very specific regulations to prevent piracy of its logo and mascot symbols for the 2008 Summer Games. The penalties include a maximum fine of $6,200. Chinese media reports that since 2002, nearly 2,300 violations have been taken to court and resulting in $100,000 in fines. The government also has destroyed nearly 2.5 million pieces of fake Olympic goods."

You can listen (recommended) to or read the reportage here.
continue reading ...

Intellectual Property of German Train Gone With The Wind

Deutsche Welle wrote China Masters German Train Technology, Will Cut Costs.
Transrapid International, a German consortium between ThyssenKrupp and Siemens, had designed and built the magnetic levitation (maglev) trains.

"China operates the world's only commercial MAGLEV line, which runs 30 kilometers from Shanghai's airport to the financial center in the Pudong district." See, here.

Transrapid has already signed a deal to be involved in the new maglev line from Shanghai to Hangzhou. According to the China Daily Zhang Xiaqiang, vice minister of the National Development and Reform Commission, said that costs were expected to fall now that China mastered the German technology. Implied is that Transrapid's role is to be scaled back.

"The China Daily said the State Council, China's cabinet, was encouraging engineers to "learn and absorb foreign advanced technologies while making further innovations.""

After learning and absorbing, the China Aviation Industry Corporation has said it will build a new Chinese Zhui Feng (Hunt the Wind) magnetic train.

Hunt the Wind

The reaction of the Bavarian premier Edmund Stoiber was:
"What's happening in China smells suspiciously like technology theft." Stoiber has suggested putting the issue of Chinese development and intellectual property protections on the agenda of the next G8 meeting.

The head of ThyssenKrupp, Ekkehard Schulz said:
"It appears that some Chinese patents overlap quite a bit with our own."

Manik Mehta wrote in Der Spiegel article Technologie-Klau in China: Kampf den Kopisten that the Chinese minister of foreign affairs Li Zhaoxing had assured his German counterpart Frank-Walter Steinmeier that no patents of Transrapid were infringed. Steinmeier reacted that they the intellectual property rights and its protection deviate. Read more here (in German).

The China Aviation Industry Corporation is denying that Zhui Feng's technology is dependent on foreign technology. "It is much lighter than the Transrapid product and features a much more advanced design."

Airbus take heed

Chinese Aviation Industry Corporation's strategy seems to be: Learn and absorb, cut costs and improve, and after technology transfer it's time for good bye. Aircraft manufacturer Airbus, just like Transrapid International a consortium, is already manufacturing big part of planes in Asia. Airbus, in cut-throat competition with Boeing, will start to manufacture complete aircrafts in China as of 2008. But China has already announced it will launch its own version of jumbo sized airplane. So Airbus is already warned for any future IPR infringments.

Read the DW article here.
continue reading ...

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Counterfeit Crime in US Sanctioned Comparable to China?

Recently, China sent a counterfeit golf club distributor and a retailer to jail for 3.5 years and half a year respectively, read more here.

If the case below is representative the sanctions in the US may be comparable to those in China:
Two Chinese nationals, Shao and Fu, were convicted by US District judge Paul Huck in Miami for:
- importing from China counterfeit merchandise, such as Gucci handbags, Rolex watches, Nike baseball caps and other merchandise and selling it to vendors at the Opa-Locka Flea Market and directly to consumers;
- selling fake electrical cords, that were filled with rubber to make them appear thicker and may cause safety hazards;
- authorities seized more than $3 million worth of counterfeit goods at Port Everglades.

Time line:
-december 2005 the two were arrrested;
-februari 10, each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy and one count of trafficking in counterfeit goods;
-two weeks later they with draw the withdraw their pleas because they said they could not understand the translator.

Sentences:
Lizhou Shao to just over three years in prison;
Li Fen Fu to two and a half years, but because she is pregnant, her sentence will be delayed.

Read Vanessa Blum's article for the Sun-Sentinel here.

What about criminal sanctions in the EU? That's another story, see more about the EU directive on criminal enforcement of IP infringement here.
continue reading ...

New Balance and Third Shift Or How to Make A Competitor Out of Your Contractor

Roger Parloff wrote Not Exactly Counterfeit for Fortune, a great article about unauthorised production by otherwise authorised contractors. These so called third-shift activities exist out of night shifts and production after termination of contract.

Parloff illustrates the phenomena by the New Balance case. The conclusion of New Balance's ordeal is, that even if a company takes all preventive measures necessary, it still can go wrong. Dan Harris of China Law Blog wrote an interesting comment about it, read here and Jeff Trexler who wrote the Knockoff News nr. 16 for Counterfeit Chic has the picture of a New Balance and a 'lawful knockoff' made by a former supplier called Henkee.

Read Parloff's article here.
continue reading ...

Rare Obiter Dictum In Luis Vuitton Versus Carrefour Case

Louis Vuitton rejected mediation against Carrefour in a the first high profile dispute between two Western companies in China, read more here.

Ben Moshinsky wrote in the article for The Lawyer named Carrefour Fined in China Piracy Case that a Shanghai court has fined Carrefour £25,000 for selling fake Louis Vuitton handbags.

Moshinsky wrote: "Chief Judge Shen Zhi Xian presided over the case and issued a rare, non-binding judicial directive along with his judgment. The directive expressed personal views of the judge and requested that Carrefour change its purchasing policy."
The judge was referring to the policy whereby the purchasing was completely delegated to the branch manager, without sufficient supervision on IPR by the central management.

Fangda Law advised Louis Vuitton.
Shanghai firm Jing Hong advised Carrefour.

Douglas Clark, Lovells IP partner in Shanghai, made clear that Carrefour is not an exception: "A large number of foreign retailers in China, such as B&Q and WalMart, are all running the risk of purchasing counterfeits unintentionally and then selling them if they don't put in supplier integrity checks."

Read Moshinsky's article here.
continue reading ...

After Track Record in China Leong May-Seey becomes IFPI's Asia Director


The International Federation of Phonogram and Videogram Producers (IFPI), a lobby group of the recording industry that fights piracy, chose Leong May-Seey as regional director for Asia.

"May-Seey will co-ordinate IFPI's priorities across Asia, ranging from legal policy and government affairs to helping develop the digital music business and unlocking the music market of mainland China. She oversees the activities of ten national groups in the region as well as IFPI's representative office in Beijing.

May-Seey has played a leading role in IFPI's operations in Asia in recent years, in particular setting up national collecting societies for performance royalties and more recently preparing a robust industry strategy to tackle Internet piracy in China."

Read IFPI's press message here.

Wikipedia's description of IFPI here.
continue reading ...

Only 5,000 Companies That Pay For Background Music In The Whole Of China

People's Daily Online runs a Xinhua story with the title More than 5,000 companies pay for "background music" in China.

According to Qu Jingming, secretary-general of the Chinese Music Copyright Protection Association (CMCP) it is required by standard international practice that public venues obtain permission and pay royalties for background music: "It is also clearly defined in our national law."

Qu is referring to article 8 of the Amended Copyright Law of the PRC 2001:
The copyright owners and copyright-related right holders may authorize an organization for collective administration of copyright to exercise the copyright or any copyright-related right. After authorization, the organization for collective administration of copyright may, in its own name, claim the right for the copyright owners and copyright-related right holders, and participate, as an interested party, in litigation or arbitration relating to the copyright or copyright-related right. The organization for collective administration of copyright is a non-profit organization. Provisions for the mode of its establishment, rights and obligations, collection and distribution of the royalties of copyright licensing, and supervision and administration thereof shall be separately established by the State Council.

The Music Copyright Society of China (MCSC) is such an organisation for collective administration of copyright, also called a collecting society. MCSC, established in December 17, 1992, is a non profit-making social organization with the status of a legal person in whose name the Chinese music copyright owners exercise their rights by way of collective administration. MCSC is subject to the vocational guidance and supervision and management of the Press and Publication of China (National Copyright Administration of China, NCAC ), Musician Association of China and the Ministry of Civil Affairs.

In 2001, only 63 companies in China paid for background music, read here. Compared to the size of the country and the number of shops and restaurants that play background music the number "over 5,000 companies" in 2006 is still extremely low. That is, if the word "over" does not mean a few honderd thousand companies.

Read the People's Daily Online here.
continue reading ...

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Baker & McKenzie Will Board Up Possibilities To Trade 21 Pirated Brands At Markets

Liu Weifeng wrote for China Daily the article US law firm joins fight against IPR violations about US law firm Baker & McKensey that announced a year-long campaign to fight against the production and trade of fake products on behalf 21 brands, including Adidas, Puma, Luis Vuitton, Calvin Klein, Chanel, Gucci.

"It would take one year to inspect the markets in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen in efforts to detect the fake products before launching the legal process."

What Liu probably means is that Baker & McKenzie will inspect these markets for one year.

Luo Zhenghong, senior consultant of Baker & McKenzie is making efforts to call for the improvement of the contract between retailers and markets: "A sales ban for fake products should be added to the rental contract before any booth is rented or purchased by the retailers," he said."

So the opportunity for counterfeit trade at famous markets in China is deterioriating:
  • Next to the permanent watchdog of the AIC in Beijing, read more here;
  • you are getting investigators send by Baker & McKensey;
  • the retailer is bound by contract to refrain from selling counterfeit products;
  • if all goes wrong, the landlord is liable, read more here.
Read Liu's article here.
continue reading ...

Counterfeiters' Learning Curve Is Peaking: NEC versus 'NEC'

David Lague wrote The Next Step in Pirating: Faking a Brand for the International Herald Tribune. It's a fascinating account of a well organised hijack of a whole company, NEC in this case. The learning curve of counterfeit producers is peaking to new hights. A company's worst night mare.

"... the pirates copied NEC products, and went as far as developing their own range of consumer electronic products - everything from home entertainment centers to MP3 players. They also coordinated manufacturing and distribution, collecting all the proceeds."

Only after two years and thousands of hours investigation in conjunction with the law enforcement authorities of China, Taiwan and Japan the scheme was discovered.

"Evidence seized in raids on 18 factories and warehouses in China and Taiwan over the past year showed that the counterfeiters had set up what amounted to a parallel NEC brand with links to a network of more than 50 electronics factories in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan."

Because the counterfeiters' approach to profit from the brand by using a parallel company was so well organised, they even carried NEC business cards, it's not so wonder that many a factory owner was duped into beliefing he was producing legitimately for NEC.

Read Lague's article here.

About Shadow companies that register in Hong Kong a name of an already known company to exploit that name in China in bad faith and the rigid interpretation of the companies ordinance that makes it possible, read here.
continue reading ...

Copyright Infringement Case: China Aomei versus Shanghai Holdfast

"The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court accepted an intellectual property case involving the largest amount of compensation in the city, the court said yesterday. China Aomei Network Co Ltd filed a lawsuit against Shanghai Holdfast Online Information Technology Co Ltd for violating its copyright on five online games. Aomei is seeking 120 million yuan (US$14.8 million) in compensation and a public apology."

Source: Shanghai Daily
continue reading ...

Permanent IPR Watchdog at Silk Market, Beware of The Waterbed Principle

After the court decision in the Beijing Silk Market Appeal Case, read here, the Chinese authorities seem to take intellectual property infringement very seriously. Now they even have opened a permanent office to watch for any counterfeit product.

The office, a local administration of industry and commerce (AIC), "is staffed by eight officials equipped with digital cameras who will patrol the alley throughout opening hours from 9 am to 9 pm, the Beijing News said."

The Beijing AIC should beware of the waterbed principle. If you try to solve a problem at one place, it can reappear somewhere else. Before and after opening hours of Silk Market the risk may return or it may pop up at another market. Some expect the pirated goods sellers to try to sell via the internet.

Read the AFX article published by Forbes here.
continue reading ...

New Sanctions For Publishing Houses in Case of Copyright Infringement of Dictionaries

Lu Hui of Xinhui wrote that the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) on the quality of dictionaries and reference books issued by eligible publishing houses came into effect on Monday.

"Once shoddy products or copyright infringement cases such as plagiarism were spotted, dictionary publication business of relevant publishing house will be "suspended for two years" or even "revoked", according to the regulation."

Read Lu Hui's article here.
continue reading ...

How to Ease China's Enforcement Burden?

In Xinhua's article IPR protection faces enforcement conundrum it is written that despite the statistics about fighting IP infringements you can still buy counterfeit DVD's throughout Beijing.

"Typical is a DVD shop set up in a main-floor suite of an apartment complex which even has a flashing neon DVD sign in the window. Standing in front of a rack of the latest U.S. blockbusters the owner is ready and willing to convert to selling the real thing. "We don't want to keep on selling 'daoban' ('outlaw' copies). We'll be happy to sell the legal copies and charge whatever they want." he says."

To fight intellectual property infringement Mark Cohen, intellectual property attache of the U.S. Embassy to Beijing is also looking at the opposite end of enforcement. Cohen is advocating non-enforcement measures such as opening the market, speeding up market access and developing markets with legitimate goods, so people don't have to buy counterfeit goods. Like the price cut strategy of Warner Bros. and getting more people in cinemas, read more here.

Read Xinhua's article here.
continue reading ...

Monday, May 01, 2006

MIP Supplement IP in China 2006

The Magazine Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) published its fourth annual IP in China special which comprises a full range of highly relevant articles (16) plus an editorial.
You can find them here.
continue reading ...